Saturday 27 February 2010



人嘅身體唔係件死物(e.g.水樽)!!!

同埋個水樽裡面D水係唔會諗野架
但人係會
有無諗過你呢D說話,對一D俾人強姦、離過婚嘅人,
或任何其他唔係處嘅人,係幾大傷害同侮辱!
呢D人係咪應該死咗佢算???
一個人嘅價值,點會只在於佢個性器官有無"俾人用過"??

同埋嗰種"俾人用過"嘅concept太可怕啦!

一個人用水樽飲水係完全treat個水樽as an object
即係高皓正同幕後製作者覺得同其他人做過愛嘅人(女仔?)就一定只係被人利用嘅object
唔會覺得性喺可以有愛
可以係好beautiful嘅一件事
唔係只係要嚟滿足一種thirst
根本只有一D滿口愛愛愛,但根本不知情是何物,唔識尊重伴侶,覺得女性(身體)對他人只係有一個function同value嘅人,先會無知同無恥到將一個有愛過人有被愛過而用過性去表達愛嘅人,比喻做一個污糟邋遢嘅水樽!!!

同埋唔理婚前性行為係有愛無愛都好,都唔一定係"污糟"架話?口口聲聲想幫後生仔女,宣傳吓safe sex好過啦!!!!


請問,俾人告過強姦嘅高皓正,點解仲要結婚?佢唔覺得自己好污糟咩?咁佢老婆都幾慘wor!而佢嘅邏輯,佢愛呢個人,就唔應該要佢任一知咁多人飲過,「唔係好野」嘅污糟水啦!!!

Tuesday 16 February 2010

「阿孫,我見到你張相成頭血咁嘅樣,嫲嫲嗰日喊咗成日呀....」

:'(

簽名支持動物義工黃美蘭拯救流浪狗 請求法官大人輕判

整個過程不用一分鐘,希望大家可以幫手簽同傳出去~
petition site link: http://www.petitiononline.com/maylan/petition.html
facebook link: http://www.facebook.com/event.php?eid=305835224289

2009年年中,動物義工黃美蘭為營救三隻將被處決的流浪狗挺身而出,自認為三隻狗的主人,成功協助三狗逃過一劫。數個月後的今日,黃美蘭收到告票,指控 她無牌擁有狗隻及疏忽照顧,如罪名成立須繳付三千多元的罰款。現請各位簽名支持黃美蘭,請求法官大人因應案情及黃美蘭自認三狗主人的動機,從輕法落。你們 的簽名將被呈上法庭,視為你們向法官大人的求情憑據。

三隻狗及黃美蘭的厄運始於去年年中北角出現多宗流浪貓被狗咬死的事件。當時,有義工 聲稱這三隻狗就是兇手,雖然從未親眼目睹貓隻死亡是否由狗隻造成,亦毫無證據指證三狗,仍多次聯絡特首辦公室要求『緝兇歸案』。黃美蘭本來與此案無關,但 於6月30日,她為同區水星街捕貓籠事件到北角調查,巧遇三狗。黃美蘭親眼目睹該三狗因餓極進食餵貓義工放下的貓糧,且三狗互相關顧,鶼鰈情深。正正同一 時間,北角的另一頭又傳出貓隻死亡的消息。由於黃美蘭一直與三狗同在,北角區亦有不少居民飼養狗隻,且貓屍身上沒有被襲擊的表面傷痕,所有證據完全不足以 指證三狗。

7月17日凌晨時份,漁護署出動捉拿三狗。黃美蘭確信牠們實為無辜,故聯絡署方希望將狗救出。但署方表示,由於三狗懷疑咬死貓 隻,不適合被任何人領養,除非兩日內有人以主人身份贖回狗隻,牠們將被人道毀滅。黃美蘭本著慈善的心,不忍心三狗無辜受罪得死,寧可冒著被檢控的危險亦願 意挺身而出,義助三狗。黃美蘭續聯絡不同狗場,替三狗尋找容身之處,即使受到各種冷言冷語、左推右托亦沒有放棄。最後,黃美蘭藉好心人的捐款及自支餘數, 合共花費數千元以狗主身份將三狗從漁護署救出、替牠們領狗牌及做絕育手術。黃美蘭又成功為三狗找到居所,使牠們得以於狗場共渡餘生。幾個月後的今日,三狗 已適應狗場的生活,事件似乎已經過去。

日前,黃美蘭收到法庭傳票,控告她無牌擁有狗隻及疏忽照顧,如罪名成立,黃美蘭將須繳付多達三千多元的罰款。

黃 美蘭任職家務助理,工時既長,收入又不穩定。她每個月所得的工資絕大部份都用來購買貓糧餵飼流浪貓,支付運輸流浪貓絕育的車費及其他醫療費用。黃美蘭可以 為了照顧仍須哺乳的幼貓,把牠們帶於身邊,偷偷地邊工作邊照顧。她又甘願照顧脊椎斷裂的流浪貓,把貓帶回家中照料,工作時亦須每日數次回家協助貓隻排便。 雖然薪水不多,黃美蘭每月都足襟見肘,但她仍毫無怨言、為照顧動物無怨無悔。

現時黃美蘭面臨法庭檢控,實乃完全出於她對流浪狗的不忍之心 及對公義的堅持。由始至終,黃美蘭對拯救三隻『替死鬼』不遺餘力。若非她挺身而出,三條寶貴的生命早已無辜失去。如黃美蘭罪名成立,她根本無力支付罰款。 我們認為,若有人因認作主人拯救無辜狗隻而遭檢控,實非香港政府的德政。同時,此案反映香港政府對流浪動物的保護嚴重不足,現行法例亦不利於動物福利工作 者。

現在,我們懇請各位愛護動物的朋友一起簽名支持黃美蘭,請求法官大人體諒黃美蘭的苦衷,對她予以輕判!

本活動旨在籌集簽名,請各位簽名支持因拯救狗隻而被檢控的動物義工黃美蘭,請求法官大人因應案情從輕法落。大家的簽名將被列印後呈上法庭,視為向法官大人求情的憑據。

簽名地址︰http://www.petitiononline.com/maylan/petition.html

這是收集簽名的網頁,請務必到網頁上簽名,否則不會有效!
只須填上姓名及電郵地址,整個過程不用一分鐘,請多多支持!


黃美蘭將於2010年2月23日應訊。時間緊迫,請各位踴躍支持外,亦將活動推介給你的朋友。我們需盡量收集最多簽名! 你們的簽名,就是對黃美蘭極大的支持!

Get that degree, little girl

Just saw the film An Education. (I'd actually recommend seeing it in the cinema but if you're young and broke just like me, well, I'd actually say it's worth clicking here: http://www.tudou.com/programs/view/v_W8QvZRERM/)

Not going to sum it up here. Though if you haven't seen it, you probably shouldn't be reading this coz you wouldn't know what I'm talking about, so.... go see it! lol


My mother, who gave up her job to be a housewife for years (she's now gone back to work and swears she will never return to being a housewife), said to me countless times:

讀多D書! Make sure you get that degree! No man would want you if you're, well, thick! Not the good ones anyway. But the most most most important thing is, if you don't have that degree, and if you're financially dependent on the man, then you're life is over.

Of course, not having a degree doesn't mean you're thick. Of course, you could (probably) get a job and be financially independent without a degree. And of course, I found it to be so patronising and oversimplifying, and I still do.

But today, I found myself to be saying the same things to Jenny in the film, and I find myself saying the same things to girls younger than me in this note.


I myself went through a similar experience in my first year of university, though I was not going to give up my degree for a more glamourous life (I would have been done it for love, which probably would have been much worse... haha). And the same with Jenny, I actually would have given it all up for a cheating bastard if he hadn't been so heartless that he actually just left. Right then, that killed me. But looking back, I am so glad he did and I got to finish that degree.

I would of course like to live in a different world too, but the fact is, in this one, life is much harder without a uni degree (and if you're going to say to me that people with degrees these days do lead a hard life, well, imagine the lives of people without one). And things are especially difficult for women, not to mention women who have kids to raise.

And even more importantly, yes, of course education is more than just getting a university degree, and getting a uni degree doesn't mean you've learnt anything. But luckily for me, I did philosophy and going through those 3 years in uni really did open up my eyes and change my life. Missing those few years might not just be missing out on the chance of getting a piece of paper which would be helpful to present at a job interview later on in life. You might be missing out on a chance of enlightenment.

And going back to the financial factor, maybe I will end up a bum after I graduate from my masters (which now does not look likely because of all the activism I've taken part in), but at least I had the opportunity to do my masters (and get studentship from the uni every month for it) and I will have the chance to go on to do a PhD and then get a job at a uni after that. That would be/would have been a stable life, at least. A boring one? Maybe. But it's a life of my own.

These day, the life I lead bores me out of my skull . And my mate said to me: "How can you say you lead a boring life? You're going back to report to the police station in a few days for an arrest a couple of weeks back. You get interviewed all the time and you even get followed by the paparazzi!" But I think anyone in my position would know how unbearably boring and irritating all those endless repeated little obligations and "exciting" little events are.

But at the end of the day, would I trade all this - all of this which I'd do anything to get out of - for a life of raising kids for a man who goes out to work to support me instead? NOT A CHANCE.

So unfortunately, now that I'm a little bit older, I'm going to have to do what I swore I would never do - give patronising advise to younger people - but I have to say this:
Don't marry off to someone thinking you're giving it all up to be happy for the rest of your life. GO GET THAT DEGREE FIRST!
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I did suddenly remember that there was another point where I thought about quitting uni: I was one semester away from finishing uni, broke as hell, and was backpacking in the Mainland living the most ridiculous life (and I mean that in the best way).

You know there are moments in life where you just think: i can stay here forever. And I just thought: well, there are 2 reasons why I went to uni - to learn and to get that piece of paper. I've already done the first part, but am one semester away from the second part. So walking away wouldn't be too bad.

And looking back, I wouldn't have regretted it really.
So i guess the lesson is not actually about getting that degree necessarily, but just about now planning your life to be dependent on someone else. plan your own life. live for yourself.

Monday 15 February 2010

他們的自由是血淚換回來的

今日台灣的八十後青年人得到的自由﹕遊行不會被毆打、沒有歌曲被禁播、總統民選、吶喊總統下台、警察不可以查你 iPod的東西等﹐都不是天經地義的。他們的自由是血淚換回來的。




轉載: 這一代不好好把握下一代就會流血也會怪責埋怨我
(此乃摘錄,全文請看:http://www.inmediahk.net/node/1006162:)

是故﹐影片說今日台灣的八十後青年人得到的自由﹕遊行不會被毆打、沒有歌曲被禁播、總統民選、吶喊總統下台、警察不可以查你 iPod的東西等﹐都不是天經地義的。他們的自由是血淚換回來的。

我們今日根本沒有資格取笑台灣﹐因為我們的議會徒具文明的外表﹐但被卑劣無恥﹑睜大眼睛說謊的官員﹑建制派議員﹑唐唐﹑林公公之流把持﹐正義不得彰顯。家長可以戇鳩到說黃毓民議員掟蕉、長毛講「仆街」等是教壞細路﹐那麼學唐唐﹑林公公之流、學無恥的民建聯等難道不是教壞細路成為班斯文敗類、衣冠禽獸﹖有人還說要耐性同中央爭取﹐不要過份堅持我們的權利。我們今日的自由、人權是沒有任何制度的保護﹐而可以保護我們自由人權的制度﹐就是一個可以有力監察政府的民主議會﹐有力制衡政府使用公權和資源﹐可以調查警察、官員、執法人員等。沒有這些保護﹐日後我們保護不力而失去的自由人權﹐就會要我們的下一代去用血淚與生命換回來–我們要下一代這樣﹐請問對得起自己良心嗎﹖我們看見台灣下一代享受上一代(也不過是二十多年前)用血淚換取的自由﹐我們能不趁今天能夠爭取一個可以保護這些的自由人權的民主政制努力﹐免得下一代為我們的無知、無能、短視而付出生命血淚嗎﹖

你們想下一代孩子埋怨你們沒有好好出來爭取普選﹑好好出來表態要普選嗎﹖

Saturday 13 February 2010

明天的《頭條新聞》有陳巧文 :-P

http://hk.apple.nextmedia.com/template/apple/art_main.php?iss_id=20100212&sec_id=4104&subsec_id=15333&art_id=13723947&cat_id=45&coln_id=20

我的部分其實很小,但(因此?)總體上很搞笑(as far as I know... 唔好笑唔好鬧我,我好易氹!lol),食團年飯時可看看~

Wednesday 10 February 2010

澄清

近日友人告知,發現此疑似陳巧文facebook帳戶(http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?v=info&ref=nf&id=100000686040991),現在謹此聲明,這非本人的帳戶,而本人的facebook對非在本人的friends list的人是完全不公開的,而這friends list亦只包括我親身認識的朋友。若閣下非我親身認識的朋友,閣下找到的任何facebook帳戶都不會是本人的帳戶。

另外,如以下這些 fan page: http://www.facebook.com/home.php?#!/christinachanhk?ref=ts,亦不是本人開設或管理,所以所謂「Christina Chan陳巧文」的留言,亦應不是出自本人的(本人的確曾在此fan page以私人帳戶 [但非「Christina Chan陳巧文」]的身分留言,但此情況亦屬罕見)。

再次貼一次去年剛開此blog時的聲明:

謹此聲明,我,陳巧文 (CHAN, Hau Man Christina),除卻在(1)香港獨立媒體(inmedia)曾發表和轉載數篇文章及回應他人在inmedia的文章/回應,(2)早已設定為只限 私人朋友才能檢閱的facebook帳戶發言,及(3)本人所開設的簡短網頁(http://northpolepenguin.weebly.com /)的言論以外,廿二年來從未在任何搏客(blog)、網上討論區/網上論壇(forum)、或任何其他網上空間用真名/本名(包括「陳巧文」、「巧 文」、「Christina Chan」、「Christina Hau Man Chan」、「Chan Hau Man」或任何其他涉及本人真名/本名的部分、組合、或部分的組合/組合的部分)發表任何言論(包括就著別人言論的回應)。在過去兩年,我只曾用個人網名 活躍於一個網上討論區,而該討論區為一個關心貓兒、非政治的論壇,本人發言時亦只用網名。

過去或將來於網上(以上提及之(1)、(2)、(3)及本blog或blog entry的連結除外)如有任何使用本人的真名或任何其他我真名/本名的部分、組合、或部分的組合的留言,均屬假冒、雷同或巧合,而絕非本人的發言。

Friday 5 February 2010

Wednesday 3 February 2010

馮正虎「成田起義」成功贏回國公民權 :-D

「抗爭」

常用「抗爭」一詞,但總覺得英譯「struggle」未能描繪「抗爭」的本質。

「struggle」一字,在字典通常翻譯為「鬥爭」,但少了「抗」一字,便捕捉不了兩方地位不平等的本質。平常公司內兩名職級雙等的同事因希望上位而爭寵,也可謂權力「鬥爭」。

「抗爭」的含意卻是,一方勢力顯著地比另一方巨大,而先動粗的亦是前者,所以後者才需抵抗。


必定要譯的話,也許「resistance」、「resistance struggle」比較適合。

但朋友也指出,「中文的抗爭的含義似乎更闊,似是只要是異議in action,就是抗爭」。


大家有其他提議嗎?

Tuesday 2 February 2010

尚風閣是拿到陳一諤支持的!!!!





另外,尚風閣還有種種令人疑慮的問題,如閣缺席諮詢大會等!

http://www.facebook.com/event.php?eid=264571251987&ref=mf

<轉載> 偷窺陳巧文 激化恐懼與衝突 (鄧小樺)

我真心希望陳巧文不要再佔去這麼多傳媒篇幅,無論對於我們的社會、還是對於陳巧文本人。

社會秩序 無法中和負面情緒

陳巧文往往身處抗爭的前綫,然後她身邊會出現肢體衝突,這是一種顯像的暴力。然而事情是不是這麼簡單呢?德國學者渥夫剛‧索夫斯基(Wolfgang Sofsky)的著作《暴力十二章》 (Traktatüber die Gewalt)裏,開宗明義提出:「暴力引發混亂,而秩序也成就了暴力。兩者的矛盾終究無解。一開始是因為對暴力的恐懼而建構秩序,可是秩序自身又引發新的恐懼和暴力」。

這是一種透徹的辯證觀點。是的,首先陳巧文本身的「直接行動」(direct action)有暴力的形式,但這些暴力的起因,是因為已建立的社會秩序,無法中和社會的負面情緒(仇恨、恐懼等)。而肢體衝突的暴力需要雙方去成就,示威者拉扯鐵馬、越過防綫是一種,警方也要出動警棍、盾牌、胡椒噴霧,警察的臉色也無法再保持「服務巿民」的溫和神情。以至於多年來經常有示威者投訴警方,並無根據聯合國的人權公約去保障巿民遊行集會的權利。

既被控襲警 又被偷拍

近來關於陳巧文的新聞又出現新變奏,很可能會激起新一輪的社會衝突。首先是警方落案控告陳巧文襲警。近年來示威人士被控襲警的新聞不時出現,受民間社會抨擊,巿民亦已熟知香港法例中「襲警」定義的偏頻:只要巿民在警察執行職務時碰觸到其制服,就可構成襲警罪。當然香港法例向來有「執法彈性」,但陳巧文被控襲警實在是揭露了「選擇性執法」的任意性:陳巧文那麼弱小的年輕女孩,能夠如何「襲擊」警方呢?巿民倒往往看到男警攔腰抱起陳巧文、陳巧文示威過往衣衫盡破。

其二是有八卦雜誌刊出陳巧文在家的偷拍內衣梳洗照,娛樂八卦本是人生小點,不應染指與嚴肅社會議題有關的範疇,欠缺操守的傳媒樂意與政權合謀,代政權出手剝削一個手無寸鐵的弱女子,幾乎是恫嚇:「示威示到出名,你就要被人睇全相。」這種時候,影視處、明光社,到哪裏去了呢?

索夫斯基指出,秩序和暴力都依靠「恐懼」來運作。因為恐懼被傷害,人類才建立社會秩序並遵守它;而因為同樣原因,當人們覺得秩序無法撫平自己的恐懼時,就會採取暴力手段。索夫斯基說,盡管人類設立愈來愈多的秩序,但恐懼依舊捲土重來,不斷升高,也改變了原因和形式,因此有了不一樣的面貌。陳巧文令普通巿民都恐懼,有天自己會因為示威而被無辜扣上襲警罪名,甚至被偷窺的目光侵擾私人空間,因而以行動改變社會更為迫切。下一波的社會衝突,還會陸續有來。